[cle-release-team] Versioning JIRA components

[Noah Botimer]

As in my just-sent, much longer response, I think voting is premature. We would be voting to support a goal. I'd rather wait and see voting to enact a very defined change that has been vetted by the build and release experts, with explicit through-lines to the big picture of 2.9 as a step to 2.10 and beyond.

Thanks,
-Noah

On Mar 19, 2013, at 11:03 AM, Anthony Whyte wrote:

> Yes, we should frame a proposal for a TCC vote.  Happy to help.
> 
> Anth
> 
> 
> On Mar 19, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Sam Ottenhoff wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> I say all this with a caveat: If we drop the indies and their potentially rapid release cycles, we need to have more rapid full Sakai maintenance releases (and if the process is simpler and quicker than it is now, I will do them). We cant wait months between releases
>> 
>> Agree with you and Anthony here.  I think we need to release near as fast as the fastest indies released.  This means 4-6 maintenance releases per major release instead of 2-3.
>> 
>> So the main goals would be: easier releases (less release tasks => more releases) and easier JIRA work (centrality of issues => easier maintenance).
>> 
>> What's the next step here?  Do I need to ask the TCC for a vote?
>> 
>> --Sam
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cle-release-team mailing list
> cle-release-team at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cle-release-team

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://collab.sakaiproject.org/pipermail/cle-release-team/attachments/20130319/884b5c3d/attachment-0006.html