[cle-release-team] 2.9.2 status check

[Anthony Whyte]

I don't think they need to hold up RC 01.  Whether they hold up 2.9.2 is for the release team to decide.

I want to keep them on the radar since they are currently not flagged for 2.9.2 (other than a 2.9.2 triage label on at least one of the tickets).

Anth


On Apr 15, 2013, at 11:47 AM, Neal Caidin wrote:

> Which need to be addressed before the release, but not before RC01, correct?
> 
> -- Neal
> 
> On Apr 15, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Anthony Whyte <arwhyte at umich.edu> wrote:
> 
>> There are also permission back-fill conversion script issues raised by Chuck Hedrick that remain unresolved.
>> 
>> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAK-23471
>> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/SAK-14373
>> both related to
>> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/KNL-1024
>> 
>> / Anth
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 15, 2013, at 11:02 AM, Neal Caidin wrote:
>> 
>>> Good points Anthony. Thanks.  
>>> 
>>> Matt says he might be able to "cut" the release by tomorrow afternoon/evening (assuming things are ready and depending on his availability). That means one QA server - Longsight.
>>> 
>>> Alan Berg says he will be available to configure his QA server on Wednesday. I haven't checked with Chuck H. yet. 
>>> 
>>> I'm finishing up the final details of the test plan. final-final details require the QA servers to be up and running. 
>>> 
>>>> From these data points, I'm guessing we will be able to start testing on Thursday, but there are still a few "hanging chads" (aka final details).
>>> 
>>> FYI - My availability next week is spotty, unfortunately, including probably missing a 1/2 day Tuesday morning (Eastern Daylight), part of Wednesday afternoon, and then I'm unavailable Thursday, April 25 through April 29 (though I should be able to check in on things this day, at a minimum). I'm not sure how/if this will impact things. 
>>> 
>>> The sooner we can finalize things the better, so I can send out a call to the community asking for QA help.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Neal
>>> 
>>> On Apr 15, 2013, at 10:37 AM, Anthony Whyte <arwhyte at umich.edu> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Down to 4 tickets at present, three of which are not ready to merge due to either missing info, merge conflicts or reversions due to problems.  Per the AntiSamy proposal we've got a day left before we are supposed to cut RC1.  I think we could live without both KNLs (never mind the SAKs).  
>>>> 
>>>> Are you guys comfortable with KNL-1051?
>>>> 
>>>> Finally, I think emails such as this should be public and posted to the cle-release-team.  While I appreciate the politeness that no doubt serves as the motivation behind these private posts, I think we should talk about this stuff in public.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> 
>>>> Anth
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Apr 15, 2013, at 7:51 AM, Neal Caidin wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>> 
>>>>> It seems like BLTI 2.1.0 is merged and I think so is AntiSamy ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> It appears there are 1/2 dozen merges left, with one blocker:
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://jira.sakaiproject.org/browse/KNL-1038
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is this a true blocker for 2.9.2 or can we proceed without it, and fix for 2.9.3? If it gets fixed will we be ready to create RC01?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Neal
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cle-release-team mailing list
>>> cle-release-team at collab.sakaiproject.org
>>> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cle-release-team
>> 
>