[cle-release-team] binary of lessonbuilder

[Steve Swinsburg]

I think releases should be performed via Jenkins, not individual users, then you can queue them up and go on to other tasks. There is too much scope for people to screw releases up and it can get tricky to resolve. I had a developer wipe out our entire Maven repo today (locally, not Sakai) because of a bad path in the deploy section. Not common, but possible and there are easy ways of eliminating it and saving time as well.

cheers,
Steve





On 11/02/2012, at 12:30 AM, Beth Kirschner wrote:

> Sounds like this might be another 'gap' in our indie release idea? If we want teams to be able to independently release components, it seems like releasing to the maven repo is part of that. But I also worry about people accidentally deploying components that they don't 'own'. Is there any way to provide permissions for just some directories in the maven repo?
> 
> - Beth
> 
> On Feb 10, 2012, at 8:27 AM, Maurer, Christopher Wayne wrote:
> 
>> I don't think he's ever been setup with permissions to do it.
>> If we do want to allow it, I'll need a public key from him so I can add it
>> to the server.
>> 
>> Chris
>> 
>> On 2/10/12 8:22 AM, "Beth Kirschner" <bkirschn at umich.edu> wrote:
>> 
>>> Anthony or Chris -- can Chuck deploy LessonBuilder to the Sakai mvn repo?
>>> 
>>> - Beth
>>> 
>>> On Feb 9, 2012, at 6:38 PM, Hedrick Charles wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Do I have write access to any of the repositories?
>>>> 
>>>> On Feb 8, 2012, at 3:28:09 PM, Beth Kirschner wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I haven't taken a look at the maven files for LessonBuilder, but you
>>>>> should be able to execute "maven deploy" to deploy a versioned copy of
>>>>> binaries to the maven repository.
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Beth
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Feb 8, 2012, at 3:24 PM, Charles Hedrick wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I've had several requests to supply a binary of lesson builder. A
>>>>>> binary is currently built, but it won't work on 2.8, primarily because
>>>>>> of the change in FormattedText. In 2.9 it is now a cover, with the
>>>>>> actual implementation in kernel-impl. If a new version of kernel-util
>>>>>> is used, it tries to find the impl, which of course is not present in
>>>>>> a 2.8 kernel.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Is there some clever way I can get the normal build process to upload
>>>>>> assemblies for both 2.9 and 2.8? I have a profile for a 2.8 build, if
>>>>>> that helps. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Alternatively, I could explicitly include a 2.8 version of
>>>>>> FormattedText, and dynamically check whether the util-impl is present,
>>>>>> calling my own if not.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cle-release-team mailing list
> cle-release-team at collab.sakaiproject.org
> http://collab.sakaiproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cle-release-team